# Can “to ease the consideration of” be used in technical context?

Someone told me that the following sentences are bad English.
He specifically critized the bold words. Furthermore, he mentioned that the second sentence cannot be correctly understood.

The distance d is measured from the ball center and reduced by the shift parameter s to ease the consideration of the ball radius r.
That also motivates the default value r for the shift parameter s.

1. Can the phrase “to ease the consideration of” be used in technical context?

2. Does “That” create a sufficently strong connection to the preceeding sentence?

Context (simplified):

A computer program calculates the contact force between a fixed plane and a ball falling on the plane. The ball and the plane are part of a more complicated physical model.

The user has a set of parameters to specify the behavorial relation of the model. The ball radius r, the shift parameter s, and a contact force characteristic f belong to that set.

The formula that is addressed by the above sentences is

F = f(d-s)

whereas d is the computed distance of the ball center from the plane and F is the contact force.

If the shift parameter s would not be taken into account in the argument of f the user would have to right-shift his force characteristic along the x-axis by the ball radius.
That is not needed because of the argument d-s. If the user has a right-shifted characteristic given he can set s to zero. If the characteristic is zero-based he can leave the default value s=r. That is meant by “easing the consideration of the ball radius”.

The above sentences are a small (slightly simplified) part of the user manual.

What I have tried so far:

I searched the net for the phrase “to ease the consideration of”. That gives many matches.

But if I [restrict the search to sites `.us`, `.uk`, and `.edu`](“to ease the consideration of” site:.us OR site:.uk OR site:.edu) the results shrink to 6 matches.

That already indicates that the phrase is wrong.

EDIT: I added the parameter name r in the first sentence to make the connection between the first and the second sentence more visible.

I recommend against using ease the consideration of. It is unclear from the phrase alone whether you want to minimize consideration or optimize consideration; it is also unclear what consideration entails. There are a few points to consider – frequency, comprehensibility in other academic writing, and your own usage.

## Frequency of Use

This expression is uncommon in academic writing, technical or not. You tried a search on Google. The situation isn’t much better in academia. On Google Scholar, I have found 32 results. That tells me it’s not common enough to be a field-specific turn of phrase. You will thus be relying on your readers’ ability to parse the usage.

## Comprehensibility

Let us take the first result from a Google Scholar search:

The mesh grid was generated in ANSA (by BETA CAE Systems S.A.) in order to ease the consideration of anatomic characteristics (i.e. integration of annulus collagen fibres). The use of this pre-processor for mesh generation facilitated the consideration of fully conforming interfaces between soft and hard tissue.

If I take ease the consideration of to mean something like simplifying the model so I have to spend less time or effort considering that factor, I would understand the sentences one way: they don’t want anatomic characteristics to be a large factor in their analysis.

However, if I take ease the consideration of to mean facilitating the study of these factors, I would generate a completely different reading – they generate the mesh grid in ANSA to focus on the anatomic characteristics. The rephrasing in the second sentence suggests that this latter reading is correct – but now a reader has spent minutes trying to understand whether anatomic characteristics are an important factor to the model or not!

So a reader, looking at ease the consideration of without much context, might think it means (1) reducing the degree to which a factor affects a model, or (2) making it easier to focus on a factor within a model. While readers in that subfield might resolve the difficulty more quickly, they will likely still have to think about it, given how uncommon the turn of phrase is.