Difference between “meeting” and “have a meeting with” [closed]

Is there a set in stone distinction between the meaning of the phrases “meeting someone” and “have a meeting with someone”? It is clear to me that the first implies a first meeting and the second does not.

But would that make “it was nice meeting you” incorrect, if you have met the person before?

Answer

One phrase uses meeting as a verb and the other as a noun. The verb emphasises the interaction while the noun emphasises the formality. So if you were getting together informally, you’d probably say that you were meeting someone, whereas if you had a set agenda and purpose for the gathering, you might prefer to say that you attended a meeting with them.

meet verb
1 Arrange or happen to come into the presence or company of (someone)
– ODO

meet with verb
1.3 Have a meeting with (someone)
– ODO

meeting noun
1 An assembly of people for a particular purpose, especially for formal discussion.
– ODO

There is considerable semantic overlap between the phrases; definition 1.3 of meet as a verb even references the noun definition: “have a meeting with (someone)”.

If you start with the noun form “has a meeting with”, you can replace it with the verb form “is meeting with“. Note that dropping with in the verb form tends to refer to an informal ‘gathering’, so going from the plain “is meeting” to “has a meeting with” tends to produce something significantly less idiomatic.

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : Harris , Answer Author : Community

Leave a Comment