Does ‘droll’ have a negative connotation?

I’d taken droll to mean something like drily amusing, but without any implied negativity.

But I’ve often heard people say

Very droll!

in response to something that they appear to find mildly amusing but not exactly LOL territory. They certainly would not have described the comment as hilarious or very amusing, which terms would be reserved for something much funnier.

For example:

Hacker: Who else is in this department?

Sir Humphrey: Well briefly, sir, I am the Permanent Under-Secretary of State, known as the Permanent Secretary. Woolley here is your Principal Private Secretary. I too have a Principal Private Secretary and he is the Principal Private Secretary to the Permanent Secretary. Directly responsible to me are ten Deputy Secretaries, 87 Under Secretaries and 219 Assistant Secretaries. Directly responsible to the Principal Private Secretaries are plain Private Secretaries, and the Prime Minister will be appointing two Parliamentary Under-Secretaries and you will be appointing your own Parliamentary Private Secretary.

Hacker: Can they all type?

Sir Humphrey: None of us can type. Mrs MacKay types: she’s the secretary.

Hacker: Pity, we could have opened an agency.

Sir Humphrey: Very droll, Minister.

Hacker: I suppose they all say that, do they?

Sir Humphrey: Certainly not Minister. Not quite all…”

(From Yes, Minister series 1, episode 1: Open Government.)

Is this a correct understanding of the term? Does it suggest a lukewarm assessment?


By and large, on the whole, not to put to fine a point on it, ‘Very droll’ is in itself, as far as one can tell, one of those phrases that speaks clearly its own meaning, when put into the context of the conversation that proceeded the remark.

When the tone of voice and body language are taken into account, one can tell quite easily the spirit in which the phrase was meant.

Source : Link , Question Author : chiastic-security , Answer Author : tchrist

Leave a Comment