“involved expense” vs “expense involved”

“involved expense” vs “expense involved”

If it were not for the expense involved, I would go there by air.

Could I use involved expense?

“objecting person” vs “person objecting”

Any person objecting has a chance to give his views at the meeting.

Could I use objecting person?

“used materials” vs “materials used”

The materials used have all been tested to make sure that they are safe.

Could I use used materials?

“received information” vs “information received”

Acting on information received. the police raided the club.

Could I use received information?

“adopted methods” vs “methods adopted”

One of the methods adopted is to organize visits to other factories.

Could I use adopted methods?

“approaching footsteps” vs “footsteps approaching”

The sound of approaching footsteps could be heard down the corridor.

Could I use footsteps approaching?


All except “used materials” are equivalent in meaning, although they differ in emphasis. When you put the participle first (e.g. “received information”) it sounds as though you wanted to emphasize that it wasn’t old information or something. When you say “information received” then the emphasis is on the information, not how it was obtained.

“Used materials” means “not new; second-hand.” That one really is very different from “materials used.”

Hope that helps.

Source : Link , Question Author : Clarity94 , Answer Author : Greg Hullender

Leave a Comment