Why are people leaving out the indefinite article ‘a’ before seemingly random nouns?

I’ve heard mostly British English people say ‘He went to hospital’ or ‘She is matriculated at university’. I’ve never understood this but accepted it as a quirk of the language like so many others.

Lately I’ve heard instances on the radio where this has been applied to seemingly random nouns. The example I heard this morning was: “When a company builds factory abroad..”. To me it feels like this is turning the singular ‘factory’ into a collective noun like the word weather or water. I don’t think these are all human speech/language errors because I’ve heard this in other cases as well, not to mention the one’s i’ve already known about like hospital and university.

Can someone explain the rules around this feature?


In English, when you are talking about a place being attended as an institution, we often leave out the article; but the choice of which institutions you can do this with varies according to the variety of English.

So in British and American English we say to/in prison and to school (though there is another difference in the preposition: AmE in school, AmE/BrE at school). But British English says to/in hospital where American English says to/in the hospital (even if this is not in reference to a particular hospital).

It’s not just geographical varieties either: there is a significant number of instances of at conference in the GloWbE corpus – more for UK and New Zealand than the US: these are predominantly in the world of politics and unions, and little used outside those fields.

Your example with “factory” is not idiomatic in any variety of English as far as I know, and I would suppose that it is either a mistake, or written by a non-native writer.

Source : Link , Question Author : apbmpls , Answer Author : Colin Fine

Leave a Comment